New Rochelle

Zoning Board

2 public meeting records

The Zoning Board in New Rochelle, NY convenes regularly to review land-use applications, zoning changes, and development proposals. LocalForesight has ingested and summarized 2 public sessions for this board. The most recent recorded session was on June 02, 2026. Latest headline: Six Variances Approved; One Addition Continued for Neighbor Talks. Each meeting record links to project profiles, docket items, and board sentiment scores.

Meeting History

Date Summary Projects Sentiment
Jun 2, 2026 Six Variances Approved; One Addition Continued for Neighbor Talks

- 120 Beaufort Place pool fence, masonry wall, and impervious surface legalization approved 5-0; board found features long-established, well-screened, and minimal hardship from variances. - 21 Circuit Road seven additional parking spaces (including compact and handicap) approved 5-0 with setback variance; neighbors objected to congestion in shared easement and safety risks, but chair emphasized parking relief; planning board to address drainage, fire access, and compact-space enforcement. - 132 Sickles Avenue one-family-to-two-family conversion approved 5-0 with FAR, lot-area, and setback variances; board cited dense neighborhood context and parking repositioning recommendation for planning board. - 236 Clinton Avenue front-porch enclosure approved 6-0 with minimal 5% FAR increase; board found practical necessity and neighborhood consistency. - 103 Gail Drive fourteen-by-twenty wood deck approved 5-0; shallow rear yard required setback variance and board found no feasible alternate location. - 40 Beech Road two-story addition (1,500 sq ft, replacing 300 sq ft garage) adjourned; neighbor at 27 Springdale Road opposed the 66% rear setback variance (10 ft proposed vs. 30 ft required), citing property-value and privacy loss and rock-removal risk; applicant to revise plans and negotiate with neighbor. - 89 Devonshire Road deck-construction extension approved 6-0; twelve-month timeline granted with no conditions or objections.

7/10
May 5, 2026 Addition Approved; Three Cases Adjourned for More Details

- 12 Elmridge Drive addition approved 5-0 for FAR and floor-area variance; applicant cut the proposal by 500 sq ft to 493 sq ft over the limit (11% variance), and comparable properties in the neighborhood already exceed the allowed FAR. - 21 Circuit Road parking expansion adjourned to June 2; applicant needs legible site plans, lighting plan showing 1.5 foot-candle minimum, and clarity on sight lines and pedestrian safety in the narrow shared driveway; neighbors expressed serious concerns about visibility from parking spaces backing into traffic, children walking to a new bus stop, and winter snow impacts. - 106 Pershing Avenue garage approved 4-1; applicant removing nonconforming detached garage from rear and replacing with 18×20 ft attached side garage to create usable backyard; combined side-yard setback variance 11.5 ft proposed vs. 20 ft required; Fernando Arias dissented citing the 42% variance. - 109 Fourth Street church conversion approved 5-0 for zero parking variance; Portuguese social club becoming church with building occupying entire lot and no feasible parking expansion; board applied balancing test and found no neighborhood character change despite 16 spaces required. - 12 Elmridge Drive addition approved 5-0; already listed above. - 132 Sickles Avenue two-family conversion adjourned to June 2026; applicant seeking variances for lot area per unit (167 sq ft short) and FAR (0.46 vs. 0.4 required); needs to submit research on comparable undersized two-family properties and revised parking plan addressing Planning Board concerns. - 40 Earle Place fence approved 5-0; wood fence 5-6 ft high (exceeding 4-ft front limit) follows natural slope; board found safety and security benefit for children and dog containment outweighs detriment; Historic Landmarks Review Board approval still required before final legalization. - 40 Green Place parking approved 5-0; legalized conversion of garage to accessible bedroom for ill husband with off-street parking space in front yard (2-ft and 1-ft setbacks vs. 30-ft and 6-ft required); board found no undesirable neighborhood impact and emphasized human circumstances.

6/10