1025 Rushmore Ave

Sign in to follow

1025 Rushmore Ave is a commercial proposed at 1025 Rushmore Ave, Mamaroneck, NY, 10543 in Mamaroneck (Village), NY. The project is currently pending before local land-use boards. LocalForesight has tracked 1 public hearing appearance before Planning Board.

Project Overview

1025 Rushmore Ave

A commercial development is proposed at 1025 Rushmore Avenue in the Village of Mamaroneck. No developer name has been specified in the available project information. The scope, scale, and current approval status of the project are not documented in the accessible records.

Subscriber content

Upgrade for full access to project intelligence.

Upgrade

Property Stats

Status Pending
Type Commercial
Address 1025 Rushmore Ave, Mamaroneck, NY, 10543

Map

Timeline

May 13, 2026
Planning Board
  • Discussion only — No vote taken; application continues to next meeting
  • Applicant seeking variance from Chapter 186 floodplain requirements to elevate and reconstruct three pools (lap, family, kiddie) above base flood elevation (BFE)
  • Board finds Race Coastal Engineering's analysis of factors (a)–(l) thorough and credible; no flooding concerns identified given tidal (not riverine) location on Long Island Sound
  • Board requested written justification explaining why design changes require variance (ADA compliance, drainage, equipment placement above BFE) rather than design avoiding variance altogether
  • Public hearing closed; resolution and written testimony on variance justification due end of week; vote expected at next meeting (approximately two weeks)

Next steps

  • Applicant to submit written justification for variance necessity (ADA, drainage, equipment placement) by end of week
  • Board counsel (Kevin) to draft resolution based on Race Coastal Engineering memo findings and testimony
  • Resolution vote scheduled for next Planning Board meeting (approximately two weeks)
  • Public hearing remains closed; no further public comment period before vote

Subscriber content

Upgrade for full access to project intelligence.

Upgrade

Sentiment

7 /10

From Planning Board · May 13, 2026

  • Board supportive overall; Chair and members found engineering analysis credible and flooding risk low due to tidal location and emergency closure protocols
  • Chair (Speaker 0) raised procedural concern: wanted clarity on why applicant chose variance-requiring design over alternative design; not a refusal, but requested documentation of necessity
  • No public opposition; no speakers attended hearing

Subscriber content

Upgrade for full access to project intelligence.

Upgrade

Related Projects