Articles about "750 White Plains Road"

The Eastchester Planning Board formally adjourned discussions for the 750 White Plains Rd redevelopment project at its September 25 meeting, pushing the next review to October 23. This means decisions on tenant special permits, especially regarding sewer capacity, will be delayed.

The Planning Board has issued a positive recommendation for Equinox to extend its operating hours at 750 White Plains Road, referring the request to the Zoning Board of Appeals for a final decision. This move aims to allow earlier morning access for gym members.

The planned discussion for the redevelopment of 750 White Plains Rd was officially adjourned and will not take place at this month's meeting, pushing all conversation to the next session.

Eastchester’s Planning Board deferred the Taco Avenue Subdivision, requiring the developer to secure signed agreements from neighboring property owners for new storm and sanitary sewer easements that have gone unrecorded for decades. The board is pushing a private developer to resolve a long-standing drainage problem on land the town itself doesn't control.

Eastchester's Planning Board approved an Equinox gym and other new tenants for 750 White Plains Road, agreeing to allow required sewer mitigation work to proceed concurrently with construction rather than delaying building permits. This decision balances the town's need to protect its sensitive sewer infrastructure with the developer's warning that strict upfront demands could jeopardize a major new commercial project.

The Eastchester Planning Board deferred a decision on the Great Day Family Child Care application for 32 Harney Road, expressing strong skepticism about the proposed traffic management plan for parent drop-offs and pick-ups. This marks a critical point for the project, as the board prioritizes safety and neighborhood impact over an applicant's assurances of voluntary compliance.

Eastchester's Planning Board deferred final approval for an accessory structure at 5 Green Meadow Road, referring it to the Architectural Review Board to develop detailed landscaping plans that could soften its visual impact. This decision came after neighbors described the large, code-compliant structure as a "second house" and an "eyesore," prompting the board to acknowledge a potential flaw in the town's zoning code.