LocalForesight LocalForesight
Join

448 Mamaroneck Ave

Sign in to follow

448 Mamaroneck Ave is a commercial proposed at 448 Mamaroneck Ave, Mamaroneck, NY, 10543-2613 in Mamaroneck (Village), NY. The project is currently pending before local land-use boards. Applicant (Tina) is listed as the developer on the public record. LocalForesight has tracked 1 public hearing appearance before Zoning Board of Appeals.

Project Overview

448 Mamaroneck Ave

A commercial project is proposed at 448 Mamaroneck Avenue in the Village of Mamaroneck. The applicant is Tina. Beyond the address and developer name, specific details about the scope of work, zoning classification, required variances, and current approval status are not available.

Subscriber content

Upgrade for full access to project intelligence.

Upgrade

Property Stats

Status Pending
Type Commercial
Address 448 Mamaroneck Ave, Mamaroneck, NY, 10543-2613
Developer Applicant (Tina)

Map

Timeline

May 7, 2026
Zoning Board of Appeals
  • Hearing closed — Board determined applicant does not need area variance for carryout food; 70% dine-in, 30% takeout does not qualify as "carryout restaurant" under code definition (which requires primarily off-premises sales)
  • Special permit for restaurant use still required — Applicant must obtain separate approval for restaurant operation at location
  • Cafe restaurant planned: matcha drinks, noodles, poke bowls, light food; 31 total seats (21 main, 10 party room); waiter service; 11 AM–9 PM, 7 days/week
  • Small kitchen for heating/boiling only; 3 staff members; background music only (no live music)
  • Board noted variance requirement appears inconsistent with other restaurants on Mamaroneck Avenue; Board of Trustees has not acted on prior draft zoning code amendment

Next steps

  • Applicant must obtain special permit for restaurant use (separate from area variance)
  • No submission deadline or return date specified in transcript; hearing closed

Subscriber content

Upgrade for full access to project intelligence.

Upgrade

Sentiment

7 /10

From Zoning Board of Appeals · May 7, 2026

  • Board supportive and collaborative; members questioned whether variance was necessary, ultimately agreeing applicant does not meet carryout restaurant definition and does not need variance
  • Speaker 3 (board member) expressed skepticism that variance was needed, noting most restaurants have 25–30% takeout; Speaker 0 (board chair) and Speaker 5 focused on operational details (staffing, seating, menu) without objection
  • No public opposition heard; applicant presented confidently; board friendly and welcoming tone throughout

Subscriber content

Upgrade for full access to project intelligence.

Upgrade

Related Projects