19 Mountain Pleasant Lane

Sign in to follow

19 Mountain Pleasant Lane is a residential proposed at 19 Mt Pleasant Ln, Irvington, NY 10533, USA in Greenburgh, NY. The project is currently pending before local land-use boards. LocalForesight has tracked 1 public hearing appearance before Zoning Board of Appeals.

Project Overview

19 Mountain Pleasant Lane

A residential project is proposed at 19 Mountain Pleasant Lane in Greenburgh. No additional details about the scope, scale, or developer are currently available. The project's status in the approval process is not documented.

Subscriber content

Upgrade for full access to project intelligence.

Upgrade

Property Stats

Status Pending
Type Residential
Address 19 Mt Pleasant Ln, Irvington, NY 10533, USA

Map

Timeline

Jun 18, 2026
Zoning Board of Appeals
  • Discussion only; matter adjourned – Board expressed significant concerns about nonconforming setbacks and declined to vote; indicated applicant should reconsider design
  • Three variances sought: shed setback (0.97 feet from required 12 feet), pool equipment patio setback (7.4 feet from required 10 feet), and concrete patio configuration
  • Shed is existing structure (15+ years old, enlarged 6 years ago to 443 sq ft); pool and equipment are proposed
  • Board noted shed could be relocated or modified during pool construction; questioned why nonconforming location was only option when site is large and blank slate
  • Four letters of support from immediate neighbors; one non-adjacent neighbor submitted conceptual objection (later clarified concern about precedent)

Next steps

  • Matter adjourned – no date certain set for continued hearing
  • Applicant may reconsider design and resubmit; board suggested minimizing variance request (though without commitment to approval)
  • Board indicated willingness to hear application again with potentially modified proposal

Subscriber content

Upgrade for full access to project intelligence.

Upgrade

Sentiment

3 /10

From Zoning Board of Appeals · Jun 18, 2026

  • Board majority (at least 3 members) skeptical: Chair and other board members viewed variances as unnecessary given site size and lack of existing pool; questioned applicant's logic for keeping structure in nonconforming location when moving it or redesigning during pool construction is feasible
  • Applicant and attorney argued existing shed and neighbor support mitigate concerns; emphasized aesthetic and topographic rationale for location (steep slope elsewhere) but were not persuasive to board
  • Neighbors supportive (4 letters of support from adjacent property owners); one non-adjacent objector concerned about precedent but acknowledged lack of firsthand impact

Subscriber content

Upgrade for full access to project intelligence.

Upgrade

Related Projects